eatbolt
Member Profile
Member Since: 2007-02-22
Last Power Points used: never • Available: now
Max Power Points: 1
Last Power Points used: never • Available: now
Max Power Points: 1
Comments
1
Subscribe
Grindhouse Videos Submitted by eatboltNavigation
- profile
- unsifted videos (0)
- personal queue videos (2)
- sifted videos (7)
- promoted published vids
- promoted queued vids
- promoted Sift Talk posts
- promoted blog posts
- blog entries (0)
- Sift Talk posts
- discarded posts
- dead/deadpool videos (0)
- my playlist bookmarks
- my post bookmarks
- playlists bookmarked by others
- posts bookmarked by others
- voted up
- voted down
- playlists
Member Stats
Rank: 518
Rating: 7 star points
Votes Received: 178
Votes Cast: 149
Comments Posted: 65 • browse
Sifted Videos: 7
Profile Views: 2716
Rating: 7 star points
Votes Received: 178
Votes Cast: 149
Comments Posted: 65 • browse
Sifted Videos: 7
Profile Views: 2716
In reply to this comment by eatbolt:
Thanks for the catch! I can't figure out where to change the title. Do you know if it's possible to edit the titles once the vids are posted?
In reply to this comment by evil_disco_man:
Hello, just wanted to mention there's a misspelling in the title and tags of your recent video - should read "Quixote." Great sift!
In reply to this comment by eatbolt:
If you like the premise of the movie, I recommend Harlan Ellison's short story, "The Prowler in the City at the Edge of the World" It's a great Jack-the-Ripper story, with lots of creepy Ellison bits.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Prowler_in_the_City_at_the_Edge_of_the_World
In reply to your comment:
“"2. that it doubtfull [sic] that shimmer [sic] will prove theories acupuncture and life energy wrong." Of course he won't prove them wrong. To assume he can prove something wrong is a logical fallacy. It formally called, "The fallacy of appealing to lack of proof of the negative"
It's not on Shermer to prove their theories are wrong, it's on the acupuncturists to prove them to be right. To prove a negative, a person would have to be able to account for every moment and every location throughout the history of the entire universe to say definitively "That never happened anywhere, ever." Someone could say, "Santa Claus exists." I say, "No. He doesn't." They say, "Prove it." That's a fallacy. It's not on me to prove (or disprove) your claim. I'm not the one making it. I could just point to the person's lack of evidence and be done with it. I don't need to disprove Aliens abducted you. You have to prove it to me since you are making the assertion. That's where the burden lay.”
what ever